The man behind FTX collapse is facing 7 criminal charges including fraud and money laundering.
If convicted, SBF could get a life sentence in prison and earn himself a spot with Ponzi and Madoff in the GSAT (Greatest Scammers of All Time) race.
Day 1
To be fair…
Day one was underwhelming.
No witnesses. No legal arguments. No “objection your honor!” yelled across the room. Day 1 was “picking the jury day.”
No fun at all. So let’s skip that.
Caroline Ellison’s Testimony
Ellison, 28, is the government’s highly anticipated star witness in the six-week trial of Bankman-Fried. She was the CEO of Alameda Research, the hedge fund that allegedly stole billions of dollars from FTX customers.
She entered a plea agreement to cooperate with the U.S. government and was SBF’s ex-girlfriend.
What Did Gary Wang Say?
The facts: Crypto exchange FTX used hidden Python code to misrepresent the value of its insurance fund (meant to prevent user losses during liquidation events), according to testimony from FTX co-founder Gary Wang.
The story: In a damning testimony, FTX’s former chief technology officer, Gary Wang, said that FTX’s so-called $100-million insurance fund in 2021 was fabricated and never contained any of the exchange’s FTX tokens (FTT) as claimed.
Instead, the figure shown to the public was calculated by multiplying the daily trading volume of the FTX token by a random number close to 7,500.
So, that’s how you create an insurance fund. With magic numbers. *Sigh*
Yesterday was the moment we’d all been waiting for…
A live remake of what Eminem warned us about 20 years ago in Lose Yourself
“His palms are sweaty, knees weak, arms are heavy.”
It was time for SBF himself to take the stand. And the strategy he adopted is probably the most known defense in lawyer history: advice of counsel.
Or as Saul Goodman would say, “My lawyer at the time told me it was OK.”
That’s why most of the discussions focused on Dan Friedberg, FTX’s former lawyer.
Who created FTX’s terms of service? Dan.
Who signed the applications for their bank account? Dan.
Who told SBF which messages to auto-delete on Signal? Dan.
Dan was the hottest name in the arena that week.
It was either that or Sam repeating “I don’t recall” (104 times exactly) which is another version of pleading the fifth (aka protecting oneself against self-incrimination).
Even his own lawyer took a jab at him:
The defense also pushed the fact that Alameda (which led to the collapse) was not directly managed by SBF and other minor arguments that didn’t resonate with the audience according to Tiffany Fong during an interview with Coinbureau.
They also pictured the defendant as an entrepreneur who made “terrible mistakes” in good faith, denying accusations that he directed his inner circle to make political contributions (he was Biden’s second biggest donor) and venture investments and purchase luxury real estate with customer funds.
On the other side, we got a GOTCHA moment when the State Attorney said, “That’s fraud. It’s stealing, plain and simple. Before FTX, there was Alameda,” presenting one of the many charts the government used as evidence. He also added extensive evidence to the prosecution’s case, including testimony from officials and law enforcement agents trying to prove Sam’s entanglement.
And now the BIG reveal.
A jury of 12 has decided that SBF was…
GUILTY on all charges.
The sentence will be given on March 26th. Justice has been served, and the fallen “king of crypto”.
SBF had one shot, one opportunity to achieve a generational finance revolution, but he dropped the ball so hard that th3 whole crypto-industry is still feeling the shockwaves of it.
Sam has fucked around, and he is finding out the consequences of his actions.